Abstract
BackgroundClimate change directly affects species by altering their physical environment and indirectly affects species by altering interspecific interactions such as predation and competition. Recent studies have shown that the indirect effects of climate change may amplify or counteract the direct effects. However, little is known about the the relative strength of direct and indirect effects or their potential to impact population persistence.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe studied the effects of altered precipitation and interspecific interactions on the low-density tiller growth rates and biomass production of three perennial grass species in a Kansas, USA mixed prairie. We transplanted plugs of each species into local neighborhoods of heterospecific competitors and then exposed the plugs to a factorial manipulation of growing season precipitation and neighbor removal. Precipitation treatments had significant direct effects on two of the three species. Interspecific competition also had strong effects, reducing low-density tiller growth rates and aboveground biomass production for all three species. In fact, in the presence of competitors, (log) tiller growth rates were close to or below zero for all three species. However, we found no convincing evidence that per capita competitive effects changed with precipitation, as shown by a lack of significant precipitation × competition interactions.Conclusions/SignificanceWe found little evidence that altered precipitation will influence per capita competitive effects. However, based on species' very low growth rates in the presence of competitors in some precipitation treatments, interspecific interactions appear strong enough to affect the balance between population persistence and local extinction. Therefore, ecological forecasting models should include the effect of interspecific interactions on population growth, even if such interaction coefficients are treated as constants.
Highlights
Climate change directly affects species by altering their physical environment and indirectly affects species by altering interspecific interactions such as predation and competition [1,2]
Based on species’ very low growth rates in the presence of competitors in some precipitation treatments, interspecific interactions appear strong enough to affect the balance between population persistence and local extinction
Ecological forecasting models should include the effect of interspecific interactions on population growth, even if such interaction coefficients are treated as constants
Summary
Climate change directly affects species by altering their physical environment and indirectly affects species by altering interspecific interactions such as predation and competition [1,2] These indirect effects may amplify or counteract the direct effects of climate change. Climate change could alter the per capita effects of these heterospecifics on the focal species. The direct effects of climate change alter organism performance via ro, while the indirect effects mediated by competitors emerge from changes in the second term. Climate change directly affects species by altering their physical environment and indirectly affects species by altering interspecific interactions such as predation and competition. Little is known about the the relative strength of direct and indirect effects or their potential to impact population persistence
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.