Direct and bystander effects induced by scattered radiation generated during penetration of radiation inside a water-phantom

Abstract

In this study, the dose distribution of photon (6 MV) and electron (22 MeV) radiation in a water-phantom was compared with the frequency of apoptotic and micronucleated cells of two human cell lines (BEAS-2B normal bronchial epithelial cells and A549 lung cancer epithelial cells). Formation of micronuclei and apoptotic-like bodies was evaluated by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus test. Measurements were performed for five different phantom depths (3–20 cm). Irradiated cells were placed in a water-phantom in three variants: directly on the axis in the beam, under shielding (only in photon radiation) and outside the beam field. The results reveal a discrepancy between the distribution of physical dose at different depths of the water-phantom and biological effects. This discrepancy is of special significance in case of cells irradiated at a greater depth or placed outside the field and under shield during the exposure to radiation. The frequency of cytogenetic damage was higher than the expected value based on the physical dose received at different depths. Cells placed outside the beam axis were exposed to scattered radiation at very low doses, so we tested if bystander effects could have had a role in the observed discrepancy between physical radiation dose and biological response. We explored this question by use of a medium-transfer technique in which medium (ICM—irradiation conditioned medium) from irradiated cells was transferred to non-irradiated (bystander) cells. The results indicate that when cells were incubated in ICM transferred from cells irradiated at bigger depths or from cells exposed outside the radiation field, the number of apoptotic and micronucleated cells was similar to that after direct irradiation. This suggests that these damages are caused by factors released by irradiated cells into the medium rather than being induced directly in DNA by X-rays. Evaluation of biological effects of scattered radiation appears useful for clinical practice.