Abstract

Whereas diplomacy in international relations still remain to be the use of negotiations and discussions in the daily interactions of states and non – state actors, the former takes precedence without a minimalist approach to what the former brings to diplomacy in the world system. The imperative of diplomacy has spread from its inception to the contemporary pitting its practicality with what the discipline ought to be. In this scenario, the traditionally big states seem to be cognizant that the ‘small states’ have a central place for proper global balance of power and to their success. This robust – dynamic nature of diplomacy creates crossroads of a kind in the 21 st Century. In this matrix, this paper would want to interrogate the central idea by; examining changes in diplomacy through to the 21 st Century, assess the systemic vis a vis practical attributes of diplomacy in global power play of the 21 st Century, and finally to establish possible strategies that ‘small states’ can take in their diplomacy in the 21 st Century. At the end of this discourse, the field of diplomacy will have been enriched by suggestions that diplomacy as a practice and a language among modern states is about what works – this being the reason for its constant change. The study will also underscore that ‘small state diplomacy’ is bound to re-ignite the Westphalian principle of equality of states in the 21 st Century despite size and other dispositional attributes of states. The exigency/flashpoint of the 21 st Century is its proneness to being an open field for practical purposes due to technology explosion. Keywords: Diplomacy, Practical Diplomacy, Small State Diplomacy, Global Power Play, Traditional Diplomacy, Modern Diplomacy, 21 st Century Diplomacy DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/83-04 Publication date: June 30 th 2020

Highlights

  • Introduction and Background to the StudyDiplomacy takes place in the world system through a number of events, conversations, communications, etc

  • In addition to what proponents such as De Callieres, Satow, Nicolson, and Berridge affirm we find there is associational link of diplomacy here to what other scholars (Jackson and Murray above) have termed ‘holders of good offices’

  • The dialectics of continuity and change as Pigman and Chichester (2010) put are key to understanding diplomacy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction and Background to the StudyDiplomacy takes place in the world system through a number of events, conversations, communications, etc. Modernization has added premium to the earlier form of diplomacy and well adored – representational (still the mainstream) through electronic communications, as well as many informal formal interactions in diplomatic intercourse. Many times these meetings are public and private. Diplomacy does not mean state relations are rosy affairs. It is true often leaders may disagree on international religious policies, sports fora, trade policy, foreign policy, or other issues of importance to them. Diplomacy is often encouraged to calm violence in settling disputes

Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call