Abstract
Evaluating the disruptive nature of academic ideas is a new area of research evaluation that moves beyond standard citation-based metrics by taking into account the broader citation context of publications or patents. The "$CD$ index" and a number of related indicators have been proposed in order to characterise mathematically the disruptiveness of scientific publications or patents. This research area has generated a lot of attention in recent years, yet there is no general consensus on the significance and reliability of disruption indices. More experimentation and evaluation would be desirable, however is hampered by the fact that these indicators are expensive and time-consuming to calculate, especially if done at scale on large citation networks. We present a novel method to calculate disruption indices that leverages the Dimensions cloud-based research infrastructure and reduces the computational time taken to produce such indices by an order of magnitude, as well as making available such functionalities within an online environment that requires no set-up efforts. We explain the novel algorithm and describe how its results align with preexisting implementations of disruption indicators. This method will enable researchers to develop, validate and improve mathematical disruption models more quickly and with more precision, thus contributing to the development of this new research area.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Number Of Related Indicators
Citation-based Metrics
Large Citation Networks
Research Area
Order Of Magnitude
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedSimilar Papers
Jan 1, 2013
Gastroenterology
Nov 1, 2006
Nov 10, 2018
Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan
Oct 27, 2022
Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Oct 19, 2015
Review of Scientific Instruments
Sep 1, 2016
Oct 17, 2014
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Oct 1, 2007
National Science Review
Aug 12, 2016
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
Jan 1, 2005
Jun 10, 2022
Jun 10, 2022