Abstract
The purpose of this research was to determine the compatibility and dimensional variability between nonstandardized gutta-percha points and matching finger spreaders. The diameters of nonstandardized gutta-percha points (n = 15) and matching finger spreaders (n = 15) from different manufacturers (Kerr, Dentsply Maillefer, Vereignigte Dentalwerke and Roeko) were determined and statistically analysed using a profile projector under a magnification of 50 x (+/- 0.002 mm). The dimensions of the finger spreaders and gutta-percha cones were inconsistent. Of the 29 groups of nonstandardized gutta-percha cones evaluated, 22 had standard deviations larger than 0.020 at D1. The standard deviations at D11 were greater than at D1, with the exception of those manufactured by Roeko. Overall, nonstandardized gutta-percha cones made by VDW had the greatest dimensional consistency within each size group; the largest variations were seen in the Dentsply Maillefer gutta-percha points. The 13 sizes of nonstandardized finger spreaders were more consistent. The results of this study show that corresponding sizes of nonstandardized finger spreaders and gutta-percha cones have statistically significant differences. There were large dimensional variations within sizes and discrepancies between the nominal size and actual size. Thus, these discrepancies may cause problems during root canal filling.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.