Abstract

Previous studies on accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) printed model focused on full arch measurements at few points. The aim of this study was to examine the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed models which were teeth-prepped for three-unit fixed prostheses, especially at margin and proximal contact areas. The prepped dental model was scanned with a desktop scanner. Using this reference file, test models were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP), Multi-Jet printing (MJP), and stereo-lithography apparatus (SLA) techniques. We calculated the accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D-printed models on 3D planes, and deviations of each measured points at buccolingual and mesiodistal planes. We also analyzed the surface roughness of resin printed models. For overall 3D analysis, MJP showed significantly higher accuracy (trueness) than DLP and SLA techniques; however, there was not any statistically significant difference on precision. For deviations on margins of molar tooth and distance to proximal contact, MJP showed significantly accurate results; however, for a premolar tooth, there was no significant difference between the groups. 3D color maps of printed models showed contraction buccolingually, and surface roughness of the models fabricated by MJP technique was observed as the lowest. The accuracy of the 3D-printed resin models by DLP, MJP, and SLA techniques showed a clinically acceptable range to use as a working model for manufacturing dental prostheses

Highlights

  • Digital models can be used to manufacture various dental appliances including fixed prostheses [1]

  • For overall 3D analysis at mesiodistal section, digital light processing (DLP) (0.100 ± 0.022 mm) and Multi-Jet printing (MJP) (0.098 ± 0.010 mm) techniques showed better results compared to stereo-lithography apparatus (SLA) (0.123 ± 0.008 mm) technique (p < 0.001)

  • Even though results from this study showed DLP and SLA techniques were more precise than MJP, no statistically significant differences between groups were found (p = 0.381)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Digital models can be used to manufacture various dental appliances including fixed prostheses [1]. It is understood that the fit of fixed prostheses is the most important requirement for its stability and good prognosis. This recent development meant that the fit between the abutment and fixed prostheses cannot be determined until a clinician places a restoration in the oral cavity of a patient because it is manufactured only as a digital computer model. Fabrication of real working models by digital files can be recommended for verifying and correcting ideal fit before delivery. There are two kinds of new ways to manufacture a dental working model with a scanned digital file; the first is a model fabricated by computer numerical control (CNC)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call