Abstract
Today's thin stone veneers must be designed to resist, besides their self-weight, high wind pressures and induced seismic forces. They must accommodate hygrometric differential movement, deflection, vibration and creep, etc. When available, code requirements do not provide an accurate or realistic safety factor for the specific type of anchor and or stone used in a project. Global safety factors that are recommended by stone industry associations are imprecise and used as rules of thumb. Limit state design has replaced the older concept of allowable stress design in most forms of civil engineering. As a result, all modern buildings are designed in accordance with a code which is based on limit state theory for all man-made materials, yet there is an astonishing nonexistence of ′natural stone′. In this paper partial factors of safety are proposed depending on the types and on the coefficients of variation of the distributions of resistances. Their values are determined using structural reliability analysis for the load and resistance factor design format according to Eurocode 1990. Aging and stone resistance decay is outside the scope of the article, yet some guidance is provided on the influence of stone durability on stone cladding performance. An application example is used to illustrate both methods, and conclusions are drawn.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.