Abstract

Parabolic and logarithmic regressions were used to relate tree diameter to the biomass of root, root crown, bole, branch, needle, cone, and epiphytic lichens for a sample of 15 Piceamariana (Mill) trees occupying lichen woodland in the subarctic of eastern Canada. In 22 of 27 regressions both models yielded r2 values >0.82. Biomass estimates of total tree and individual component dry weights resulted in estimates with less than 6.5% difference between biomass estimates by logarithmic versus parabolic equations. For this data set the logarithmic model appeared more appropriate than the parabolic form. Validity of the regressions was judged on r2, analysis of variance, and examination of residuals. Equations generated in this study were considered to be inapplicable to P. mariana growing in closed forest. Problems in extrapolation were discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call