Abstract

While still rare, women are achieving important leadership roles as managers inside universities. This article explores the practical and theoretical dilemmas posed for academic feminists who enter such positions in the age of the rise of the ‘neoliberal academy’. These are familiar dilemmas for feminist bureaucrats – femocrats – working inside political, governmental, judicial and economic institutions but have been less explored with respect to the academy. What can academic feminists do when they take on middle or senior management roles? How do they experience being simultaneously the embodiment of institutional authority (to manage, regulate, quantify, monetise) as managers, as well as a source of oppositional knowledge as feminists? To what extent are there opportunities to work with the grain of an institution to challenge the gendered status quo from within? Or are academic feminists who manage inevitably co-opted and compromised? The article takes an autoethnographic approach to reflect upon the author’s experience as a ‘tempered radical’ in third tier management (as an executive dean and head of school) in a public research-intensive UK university, and to offer lessons about the radical potential of insider strategies of change.

Highlights

  • This article explores the practical and theoretical dilemmas posed for academic feminists1 who enter management positions in the age of the ‘neoliberal academy’

  • My approach to management is informed by my work as a feminist political scientist studying gender reform efforts during periods of restructuring and institutional change, and the efforts of ‘tempered radicals’ or femocrats: feminist bureaucrats, legislators and jurists who work within existing structures to challenge the gendered status quo despite the perils of co-option and complicity (Chappell and Mackay, 2020)

  • What do we learn about insider strategies of change and feminist leadership? All academic feminists experience the academy with ambivalence (O’Connor, 2014; Pereira, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article explores the practical and theoretical dilemmas posed for academic feminists who enter management positions in the age of the ‘neoliberal academy’. While the concept of tempered radical has travelled to varied institutional and organisational settings, its origins rest in the experiences of Debra Meyerson and Maureen Scully and their own struggles as academic feminists and humanists in a university business school It has informed my own practice as an institutional actor and has provided me with insights to make sense of my experience (see, O’Connor’s, 2014, account). In Part 3, I reflect upon my experiences seeking to connect them to wider themes in the literature and conclude that despite the undeniable struggles and mixed outcomes, taking on academic-management positions has to be one of the feminist strategies to bring about structural and cultural change

Part 1: Contexts
Part 2: Situating This Academic Feminist Manager
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call