Abstract
ABSTRACT Memory studies tend to opt for two clear paths. Either they focus on the contestation of two antagonistic narratives, each with its selection of facts, symbols and dates. Or they analyse how a memory is represented in various devices or artefacts of the dominant and/or subaltern culture. This article proposes a third path based on the combination of both options with an articulation of political science and public policy analysis. The article will analyse the historical, political and aesthetic processes within the same narrative in order to understand, on the one hand, how these narratives are formed and, on the other, why they are represented in a certain way and not in other ways. To this end, the Rosario's Memory Museum in Argentina will be taken as the object of study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
