Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.

Abstract

Most studies that have examined the effects of mammographic density and hormone therapy use on breast cancer detection have included screen-film mammography. This study further examines this association in post-menopausal women screened by digital mammography. Approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board, this study identified 688,418 women of age 50-74years screened with digital or screen-film mammography from 2008 to 2009 within the Ontario Breast Screening Program. Of 2993 eligible women with invasive breast cancer, 2450 were contacted and 1421 participated (847 screen-film mammography, 574 digital direct radiography). Mammographic density was measured by study radiologists using the standard BI-RADS classification system and by a computer-assisted method. Information on hormone therapy use was collected by a telephone-administered questionnaire. Logistic regression and two-tailed tests for significance evaluated associations between factors and detection method by mammography type. Women with >75% radiologist-measured mammographic density compared to those with <25% were more likely to be diagnosed with an interval than screen-detected cancer, with the difference being greater for those screened with screen-film (OR=6.40, 95% CI 2.30-17.85) than digital mammography (OR=2.41, 95% CI 0.67-8.58) and aged 50-64years screened with screen-film mammography (OR=10.86, 95% CI 2.96-39.57). Recent former hormone therapy users were also at an increased risk of having an interval cancer with the association being significant for women screened with digital mammography (OR=2.08, 95% CI 1.17-3.71). Breast screening using digital mammography lowers the risk of having an interval cancer for post-menopausal women aged 50-64 with greater mammographic density.