Abstract

In recent years, several competition authorities around the world have announced major investigations into potential anti-competitive behaviour by digital platforms. Not all of that behaviour harms downstream consumers. This has contributed to a growing ‘existential crisis’ at the foundation of competition law: What is the harm that competition law is designed to address? How, exactly, does competition law promote economic welfare? Separately, the literature on ecosystems emphasises the central role of non-generic complementary investments as a defining feature of ecosystems, and the power this can give to ecosystem orchestrators over their associated complementors. We draw these strands together to show how a recently-proposed economic foundation for competition law, drawing on the transactions cost literature, provides a consistent, compelling, and economically-sound foundation for competition policy towards digital platforms going forward.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call