Abstract

Digital pathology is on the verge of becoming a mainstream option for routine diagnostics. Faster whole slide image scanning has paved the way for this development, but implementation on a large scale is challenging on technical, logistical, and financial levels. Comparative studies have published reassuring data on safety and feasibility, but implementation experiences highlight the need for training and the knowledge of pitfalls. Up to half of the pathologists are reluctant to sign out reports on only digital slides and are concerned about reporting without the tool that has represented their profession since its beginning. Guidelines by international pathology organizations aim to safeguard histology in the digital realm, from image acquisition over the setup of work-stations to long-term image archiving, but must be considered a starting point only. Cost-efficiency analyses and occupational health issues need to be addressed comprehensively. Image analysis is blended into the traditional work-flow, and the approval of artificial intelligence for routine diagnostics starts to challenge human evaluation as the gold standard. Here we discuss experiences from past digital pathology implementations, future possibilities through the addition of artificial intelligence, technical and occupational health challenges, and possible changes to the pathologist’s profession.

Highlights

  • Histopathology is a diagnostic discipline founded on the visual interpretation of cellular biology captured in images

  • Up to half of the pathologists are reluctant to sign out reports on only digital slides and are concerned about reporting without the tool that has represented their profession since its beginning

  • Digital Pathology (DP) has shown exciting results for primary histopathological diagnoses, even more so with AI applications becoming embedded into the digital reporting work-flow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Histopathology is a diagnostic discipline founded on the visual interpretation of cellular biology captured in images. Digital images and video streams can be shared in real-time, bridging physical distance (telepathology) between local hospitals, colleges (second-opinion), teachers and students, and between home and workplace (home-office). They can be superimposed or linked beyond what physical glass slides would permit to facilitate spatial correlation across slides and stains. Remote viewing access requires sufficient data bandwidth (typically > 10 Mbit/s) and low latency for smooth operation. This can add up to considerable IT-capacity requirements in large pathology departments. The assessment of slides for polarization effects (e.g., amyloid, weddelit) cannot be performed on digital slide scans and necessitates evaluation from glass slides

Regulatory Requirements for WSI for Patient Diagnostics in Europe and the US
Critical Quality Parameters in WSI for Diagnostic Imaging
The Integrated DP Work-Flow
Medical Education and the Consultation Setting—Advantages and Challenges
10. Cost-Effectiveness Considerations
12. Digital Pathology and the Pathologist’s Profession
13. Important Open Challenges and How They Could Be Addressed
Findings
14. Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.