Digital health in the EP lab: Initial experience using remote access and technical support for complex ablation procedures

Abstract

Abstract Aims/Objectives Three-D electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems are a prerequisite for treatment of complex arrhythmias. Until date, the EAM system is operated by qualified staff or a field technical engineer (FTE) from the control room. Novel technology allows for remote access (RA) of the EAM from anywhere in the world. RA increases the flexibility of the EP lab, reduces travel time for the FTE and overcomes hospital access limitations e. g. during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on the safety and feasibility of remote operation of the EAM for complex ablation procedures. Methods RA mapping was achieved by combining the EAM software with an integrated audiovisual solution for remote support. Communication between the operator and the remote support was achieved using internet-based headphones in the RA group. The 3D EAM system was controlled exclusively from home office. In the conventional group (CG), EAM was exclusively controlled from the control room in the EP lab. Ablation procedures were performed as per institutional standard. Results We investigated 50 RA assisted consecutive electrophysiological procedures from 09/2022 to 02/2023 in our University Heart Center. We compared a group of patients undergoing ablation procedures with RA assistance (28/50 (56%) patients were male, median age: 66.5 yrs [IQR 56, 76], BMI: 25.2 kg/m2 [IQR 22, 30]) with a control group (31/50 (62%) male, median age: 66.5 yrs [IQR 54, 78], BMI 28.2 kg/m2 [IQR 24, 30], p > 0.05 for all). Ablation procedures were matched in both groups: 20 pulmonary vein isolations (3 paroxysmal, 17 persistent atrial fibrillation ), 4 cavotricuspidal isthmus ablations, 13 ablations of atrial tachycardia, 1 premature ventricular complex ablation, 3 of ventricular tachycardia, 2 AV reentry tachycardia and 7 AV-node reentry tachycardia cases. In the RA group, the 3D EAM system was controlled exclusively from home office in all patients. In one patient, the internet based headphone connection was instable. Therefore, the communication was established via a conventional smartphone. No other technical issue was noted. No switch to in house support was required. There were no major complications observed. Procedural data (total procedure time median 100 min [IQR 76, 120] vs. control group 86 min [IQR 60, 110], total fluoroscopy time (median 9.1 min [IQR 6, 13] vs. control group 8.7 min [IQR 5, 12], p > 0.05) were comparable to previous procedures without RA. Due to RA travel time could be reduced by 139 hr in total in comparison to the control group. Conclusions RA for EAM of any arrhythmia is feasible and safe in this single center study. Procedural data were comparable to previous procedures. In the future, this new solution might have a great impact on facilitating EP procedures.Table procedural data