Abstract
The development of information and communication technologies and the formation of the global information society give rise to the study of new directions in the evolution of diplomatic practice in the digital environment, including in the context of intercultural communication. The modern information revolution is characterized by the widespread and ever-growing use of social networks, blogs, wiki resources and other media platforms (labelled under the common term of Web 2.0 technologies). At the same time, the widespread use of Web 2.0 technologies and the increasing amount of time people all over the world spend there has a broad and profound impact on political and intercultural communication and diplomatic practice. A new phenomenon of digital diplomacy is gaining prominence among the foreign policy tools of states and international organizations. Digital diplomacy can be defined as the use of social networks and Web 2.0 technologies in public diplomacy and international interaction by states and international organizations to achieve foreign policy goals and reach foreign audiences. According to the traditional view of digital diplomacy, which has developed in the academic literature, and is reflected in the works of authors such as Manuel Castells and Joseph. Nye, it helps to strengthen network ties at the level of civil societies in different countries and thus reduces international conflicts. However, cultural differences and digital polarization can impede the potential of digital diplomacy. Today, almost all states and international organizations in the global arena are involved in the practice of digital diplomacy, and Russia is no exception. Russia actively participates in digital diplomacy by using social media and Web 2.0 tools as soft power instruments to introduce and explain foreign policy initiatives and reach foreign and domestic audiences, as stated in the 2016 Doctrine of Information Security of Russian Federation. For Russia’s foreign policy, relations with the EU countries and institutions are of particular importance, including in the digital sphere. However, even though both Russia and the EU countries make extensive use of digital diplomacy tools, the practice of horizontal network interaction mediated by digital technologies does not contribute to strengthening trust between countries and reducing conflicts. The authors consider incidents and allegations in the sphere of digital interaction and, based on the theory of digital polarization, conclude that the use of digital tools in horizontal interactions within digital diplomacy exacerbates intercultural differences between countries and increases conflict instead of improving mutual understanding.
Highlights
The development of information and communication technologies and formation of the global information society actualizes the study of new directions in the evolution of diplomatic practice in the digital environment, including in the context of intercultural communication
Digital diplomacy can be defined as the use of social networks and Web 2.0 technologies in public diplomacy and international interaction by states and international organizations to achieve foreign policy goals and reach foreign audiences
Cultural differences and digital polarization can impede the potential of digital diplomacy
Summary
При этом при анализе цифровой дипломатии мы опирались на аналитический инструментарий концепции мягкой силы [Nye, 2010; Харкевич, 2014; Цыганков, 2015; Лебедева, 2018], теоретические работы по проблематике публичной дипломатии в контексте международной безопасности [Подберезкин, 2016]; роли цифровых инструментов1 в современных международных конфликтах [Международная безопасность..., 2020], и публичной дипломатии2 в трудах [Цветкова, Кузнецов, 2020; Алборова, 2019; Manor, 2019; Bjola, Zaiotti, 2020; Hong, Kim, 2016]. Новым направлением цифровой дипломатии становится «дипломатия данных» в социальных сетях, которая представляет собой использование данных пользователей социальных сетей в целях настройки контента в соответствии с их предпочтениями — главной целью является более эффективная, инклюзивная и менее ресурсозатратная работа дипломатов [Data Diplomacy, 2019: 6–7]. — URL: https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020 6 Twiplomacy Study 2020.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.