Abstract

Objective To evaluate digital chrome endoscopy (I-Scan) and confocal laser endomieroscopy (CLE) for diagnosis of Barrett esophagus (BE). Methods From July 2010 to July 2011, a total of 878 outpatients who had upper gastrointestinal symptoms underwent routine endoscopy and I-Scan examination, screened patients with suspected Barrett's epithelial were further referred to CLE and endoscopy. The detection rate and image features of BE between routine endoscopy and I-Scan, and the diagnosis of BE be- tween pathology and CLE, were compared respectively. Results Suspected BE was diagnosed in 46 patients (5.2%) by routine endoscopy, and in 52 (5.9%) by I-Scan, and there was no significant difference in detection rate between 2 methods (X2 = 0. 533, P 〉 0. 05 ). The detection rate of paliform blood vessels between SCJ and GEJ was higher using I-Scan (35/52, 67.3% ) than routine endoscope (21/46, 45.7% , P 〈0. 05). A total of 19 suspected BE underwent CLE and biopsy, and BE was diagnosed by CLE with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion I-Scan is capable of identifying paliform blood vessels between SCJ and GEJ, and can improve the detection rate of suspected BE. CLE is able to provide in-vivo histological diagnosis of BE with a high sensitivity and specificity. Key words: Barrett esophagus ; Diagnosis ; I-Scan; Confocal laser endomicroscopy

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call