Abstract

Let \({(G,\rho)}\) be a stationary random graph, and use \({B^G_{\rho}(r)}\) to denote the ball of radius r about \({\rho}\) in G. Suppose that \({(G,\rho)}\) has annealed polynomial growth, in the sense that \({\mathbb{E}[|B^G_{\rho}(r)|] \leq O(r^k)}\) for some \({k > 0}\) and every \({r \geq 1}\). Then there is an infinite sequence of times \({\{t_n\}}\) at which the random walk \({\{X_t\}}\) on \({(G,\rho)}\) is at most diffusive: almost surely (over the choice of \({(G,\rho)}\)), there is a number \({C > 0}\) such that $$\mathbb{E} \left[\mathrm{dist}_G(X_0, X_{t_n})^2 \mid X_0 = \rho, (G,\rho)\right]\leq C t_n\qquad \forall n \geq 1\,.$$ This result is new even in the case when G is a stationary random subgraph of \({\mathbb{Z}^d}\). Combined with the work of Benjamini et al. (Ann Probab 43(5):2332–2373, 2015), it implies that G almost surely does not admit a non-constant harmonic function of sublinear growth. To complement this, we argue that passing to a subsequence of times \({\{t_n\}}\) is necessary, as there are stationary random graphs of (almost sure) polynomial growth where the random walk is almost surely superdiffusive at an infinite subset of times.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.