Abstract

BackgroundTo explore the effect of b-value distributions on the repeatability and diagnostic performance of the ADC value in rectal cancer patients using multiple b-values and mono-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).MethodsThirty-two preoperative rectal cancer patients, without receiving neoadjuvant therapy, were scanned on a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner using DWI with 10 b-values ranging from 0 to 2000 s/mm2. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was calculated using a mono-exponential model and 31 b-value combinations consisting of 2 to 10 b-values were explored. Regions of interest with the maximum cross-sectional tumour size were outlined on the ADC map by two independent observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots between the two observers were calculated and evaluated to determine repeatability. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were evaluated for rectal cancer characterization. Correlations between the mean ADC values and T stage were assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). α (= ICC + AUC + |ρ|- CV - |bias|) was defined and used to assess the optimal b-value distribution.ResultsPostoperative pathology tests revealed 4 patients with T1, 10 patients with T2, and 18 patients with T3 stages. There were no significant difference in age and sex between the two groups (T1–2 vs. T3). Excellent reproducibility was observed for ADC values between two observers with ICC and CV values ranging from 0.920 to 0.998, and 1.475 to 5.568%, respectively. The mean percent difference and ρ between the paired measurements was ranged from − 2.7 to 1.2% and from − 0.759 to − 0.407, respectively. The b-value combinations with the top three α values were b(0, 1000 s/mm2), b(500, 1500, 2000 s/mm2) and b(100, 1000, 1500 s/mm2) for α = 2.581, 2.571 and 2.569, respectively.ConclusionsThe number of b-values and their distributions influenced the repeatability of the ADC values and their diagnostic performance. The optimal b-value combination was 0 and 1000 s/mm2 for DWI examination of rectal cancer patients.

Highlights

  • To explore the effect of b-value distributions on the repeatability and diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in rectal cancer patients using multiple b-values and mono-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)

  • The ADC value has been used for the diagnosis of rectal cancer and for evaluating the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, while reflecting some histological characteristics of the lesions [8, 9]

  • We introduced a new parameter, called α, to characterize these factors: α = Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) + Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) + |ρ|- coefficient of variation (CV) - |bias|, where ICC is the intraclass coefficient; AUC is the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ρ indicates the Spearman correlation coefficient; CV is the coefficient of variability; and bias indicates the mean of the percent difference for the paired measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To explore the effect of b-value distributions on the repeatability and diagnostic performance of the ADC value in rectal cancer patients using multiple b-values and mono-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), as a functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has been used to evaluate the Brownian movement of water molecules in tissues in vivo. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which is derived from diffusion-weighted images, has been used as a quantitative parameter for assessing the water diffusion through tissue. It has been shown that ADC values have a negative correlation with tissue cellularity [5, 6]. The ADC value has been used for the diagnosis of rectal cancer and for evaluating the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, while reflecting some histological characteristics of the lesions [8, 9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call