Abstract
This paper re-examines studies of Na kinetics in canine carotid arterial wall previously reported by three groups of investigators. The similarities and differences in experimental and analytical approaches for Na arterial wall washout therein are reviewed. Major conclusions are: (1) A three-compartment model in series is adequate for all short and long (after subtracting the small slow exponential) records. (2) Values for the diffusion coefficient, however, varied markedly among the different groups. (3) A continuous sampling method as opposed to an intermittent one measures better the kinetics of a rapidly exchanging ion as Na +. (4) Models based on individual washout records are better than those based on ensemble averaging. Characterization of sets of results in terms of mean values for comparing parameters provides significant potential for distinguishing quantitative features between control and treated sets despite inadequacies in data sampling or model specifications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.