Abstract

Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward.

Highlights

  • A main effect of tone was found for response latency, and the percentage positive responses, indicating rats were able to discriminate between tones used

  • Negative judgement bias was induced by the anxiogenic drug FG7142 and chronic restraint stress and social isolation (RS&SI), but acute restraint stress failed to cause a measurable negative affective state change

  • Diffusion model analysis revealed that negative judgement bias was mainly due to increases in distance to boundaries and changes in distances relative to decision starting point

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different affective states have been shown to be associated with positive and negative judgement biases in many different species of animals (see [14, 15] for recent reviews) and in humans [16,17,18,19]. This association was first demonstrated by Harding et al [20] in rats.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call