Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the added value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with the combination of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) MRI in differentiating glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression. MethodsThirty-four patients with high-grade gliomas developing new and/or increasing enhanced lesions within six months after surgery and chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pathologically confirmed to have recurrent glioma (n = 22) or pseudoprogression (n = 12). The DKI and DSC MRI parameters were calculated based on the enhanced lesions on contrast-enhanced T1WI. ROC analysis was performed on significant variables to determine their diagnostic performance. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the best prediction model for discrimination. ResultsThe relative mean kurtosis (rMK), relative axial kurtosis (rKa), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and relative mean transit time (rMTT) of glioma recurrence were higher than those of pseudoprogression (all, P < 0.05). The AUCs and diagnostic accuracy were 0.879 and 82.35% for rMK, 0.723 and 70.59% for rKa, 0.890 and 82.35% for rCBV, 0.765 and 73.53% for rMTT, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression model showed a significant contribution of rMK (P = 0.006) and rCBV (P = 0.009) as independent imaging classifiers for discrimination. The combined use of rMK and rCBV improved the AUC to 0.924 (P < 0.001) and the diagnostic accuracy to 88.24%. ConclusionDKI may be a valuable non-invasive tool in differentiating glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression, and its use in combination with DSC MRI can improve diagnostic performance in assessing treatment response compared with either technique alone.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call