Abstract

Background: Strong correlation has been reported between tissue water diffusivity and tissue elasticity in the liver. The purpose of this study is to explore the capability of diffusion–based virtual MR elastography (VMRE) in the characterization of liver tumors by extending beyond liver fibrosis assessments. Methods: Fifty-four patients (56 liver tumors: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 31; metastases, 25) who underwent MRE, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b: 0, 800 s/mm2), and VMRE (b: 200, 1500 s/mm2) were enrolled. The MRE shear modulus (µMRE), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and shifted ADC (sADC) were obtained. Virtual stiffness (µdiff) was estimated from the relationship between µMRE and sADC. A linear discriminant analysis combining VMRE and MRE to classify HCC and metastases was performed in a training cohort (thirty-two patients) to estimate a classifier (C), and evaluate its accuracy in a testing cohort (twenty-two patients). Pearson’s correlations between µMRE, sADC, and ADC were evaluated. In addition to the discriminant analysis, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the discrimination capability between HCC and metastases. Results: The correlations between µMRE and sADC were significant for liver, HCC, and metastases (r = 0.91, 0.68, 0.71; all p < 0.05). Those between µMRE and ADC were weaker and significant only for metastases (r = 0.17, 0.20, 0.55). µdiff values were not significantly different between HCC and metastases (p = 0.56). Areas under the curves (AUC) to differentiate HCC from metastases were as follows: VMRE, 0.46; MRE alone, 0.89; MRE + VMRE, 0.96. The classifier C also provided better performance than MRE alone, in terms of sensitivity (100 vs. 93.5%, respectively) and specificity (92 vs. 76%, respectively, p = 0.046). Conclusions: The correlation between sADC and µMRE was strong both in the liver and in tumors. However, VMRE alone could not classify HCC and metastases. The combination of MRE and VMRE, however, allowed discriminant performance between HCC and metastases.

Highlights

  • This article is an open access articleA strong correlation has been recently reported between tissue water diffusivity and tissue elasticity in the liver [1,2]

  • These findings suggested that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based or Intravoxel Incoherent Motion imaging (IVIM)-based virtual elastography (VMRE) [1] could serve as an alternative to MR elastography (MRE) for the staging assessment of liver fibrosis

  • 54 patients had 56 liver tumors, 31 tumors were diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 25 tumors were diagnosed as metastatic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article is an open access articleA strong correlation has been recently reported between tissue water diffusivity and tissue elasticity in the liver [1,2]. The shifted apparent diffusion coefficient (sADC) values (obtained from the b values of 200 and 1500 s/mm2 ) in liver parenchyma were proven to be strongly correlated with the liver tissue elasticity obtained with MR elastography (MRE) in a small cohort (n = 15) [1], and in a larger patient cohort (n = 74) [2]. In both studies, tissue stiffness generated from sADC values was obtained, and was graded accurately depending on the stage of liver fibrosis. Tissue stiffness generated from sADC values was obtained, and was graded accurately depending on the stage of liver fibrosis These findings suggested that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based or Intravoxel Incoherent Motion imaging (IVIM)-based virtual elastography (VMRE) [1] could serve as an alternative to MRE for the staging assessment of liver fibrosis. The combination of MRE and VMRE, allowed discriminant performance between HCC and metastases

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call