Abstract
Conventional methods for the determination of Atterberg limits based on laboratory tests are time-consuming. Reflectance spectroscopy which is fast and cost-effective has been reported as an alternative method for estimating Atterberg limits. To assess the efficiency of the method, 60 forest soil samples were measured by visible-near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (VNIR) within the range of 350–2500 nm. The Savitzky-Golay (SG) smoothing method for spectral data was used to reduce signal noise and the first derivative reflectance (DR) was applied to accentuate the features and assemble the data for use in the modeling process. In this study, raw reflectance (R) and first derivative reflectance (DR) data were used to estimate Atterberg limits. All two-band combinations of three types of spectra (ratio index, normalized difference index and difference index) as well as PLS and PLS-BPNN were calculated to extract optimum waveband combination and calibrations between Atterberg limits and reflectance spectra. The correlation coefficients between Atterberg limits and reflectance spectra indicated both positive and negative correlation at various wavelengths across the spectrum. The highest correlation for liquid limit (r = −0.86), plastic limit (r = −0.76) and plasticity index (r = −0.7) was found at 1921, 1938 and 1913 nm, respectively. In addition, the results showed the spectral indices technique as a good method for estimating soil plasticity and improving the prediction accuracy of Atterberg limits. In the current study, PLS and PLS–BPNN were also used to develop the calibration models for estimating Atterberg limits using R and DR. The results demonstrated that the prediction accuracy of PLS-BPNN for both R and DR was higher than that of PLS. Correlation coefficients between shrinkage limit (SL) and reflectance spectra showed weak correlation, and overall reflectance had the same correlation. The results represented that this method could be used to estimate soil plasticity properties quickly, non-destructively, and with minimal sample preparation and high accuracy. These advantages may be more important, especially when a huge number of samples should be tested and analyzed within a short period of time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.