Abstract
Gas-liquid two phase flow exists in several industrial processes and light-water reactors (LWRs). A diffuse interface based finite element method with two different mesh generation methods namely, the Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) and the Arbitrary Lagrange Euler (ALE) methods is used to model the shape and velocity changes in a rising bubble. Moreover, the calculating speed and mesh generation strategies of AMR and ALE are contrasted. The simulation results agree with the Bhagat’s experiments, indicating that both mesh generation methods can simulate the characteristics of bubble accurately. We concluded that: the small bubble rises as elliptical with oscillation, whereas a larger bubble (11 mm > d > 7 mm) rises with a morphology between the elliptical and cap type with a larger oscillation. When the bubble is large (d > 11 mm), it rises up as a cap type, and the amplitude becomes smaller. Moreover, it takes longer to achieve the stable shape from the ellipsoid to the spherical cap type with the increase of the bubble diameter. The results also show that for smaller diameter case, the ALE method uses fewer grids and has a faster calculation speed, but the AMR method can solve the case of a large geometry deformation efficiently.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
