Abstract

In macromolecular crystallography, the acquisition of a complete set of diffraction intensities typically involves a high cumulative dose of X-ray radiation. In the process of data acquisition, the irradiated crystal lattice undergoes a broad range of chemical and physical changes. These result in the gradual decay of diffraction intensities, accompanied by changes in the macroscopic organization of crystal lattice order and by localized changes in electron density that, owing to complex radiation chemistry, are specific for a particular macromolecule. The decay of diffraction intensities is a well defined physical process that is fully correctable during scaling and merging analysis and therefore, while limiting the amount of diffraction, it has no other impact on phasing procedures. Specific chemical changes, which are variable even between different crystal forms of the same macromolecule, are more difficult to predict, describe and correct in data. Appearing during the process of data collection, they result in gradual changes in structure factors and therefore have profound consequences in phasing procedures. Examples of various combinations of radiation-induced changes are presented and various considerations pertinent to the determination of the best strategies for handling diffraction data analysis in representative situations are discussed.

Highlights

  • With modern X-ray sources, even for cryocooled crystals, the limit of crystal life is reached in times ranging from seconds at the strongest third-generation undulator synchrotron beamlines to hours at the most intense home sources (Yang et al, 1999)

  • Adata set from a crystal of APC5871, a Midwest Center for Structural Genomics project, was provided by Marianne Cuff, who collected it on beamline 19-ID of the Structural Biology Center (SBC) at the Advanced Photon Source (APS)

  • During X-ray exposure, owing to the cascade of electronic events resulting from the absorption of X-ray photons, atoms are randomly displaced from their initial positions in the crystal lattice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With modern X-ray sources, even for cryocooled crystals, the limit of crystal life is reached in times ranging from seconds at the strongest third-generation undulator synchrotron beamlines (http://biosync.rcsb.org/allbeamlines/allbeam.html) to hours at the most intense home sources (Yang et al, 1999). For this reason, the dose from crystal exposure is mostly determined by the experimental strategy rather than by X-ray source intensity limitations.

P212121
Sources of the analyzed diffraction data
The impact of X-ray radiation on diffraction intensities
Radiation damage and phasing strategies
Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call