Abstract

Laser-based additive manufacturing methods allow the production of complex metal structures within a single manufacturing step. However, the localized heat input and the layer-wise manufacturing manner give rise to large thermal gradients. Therefore, large internal stress (IS) during the process (and consequently residual stress (RS) at the end of production) is generated within the parts. This IS or RS can either lead to distortion or cracking during fabrication or in-service part failure, respectively. With this in view, the knowledge on the magnitude and spatial distribution of RS is important to develop strategies for its mitigation. Specifically, diffraction-based methods allow the spatial resolved determination of RS in a non-destructive fashion. In this review, common diffraction-based methods to determine RS in laser-based additive manufactured parts are presented. In fact, the unique microstructures and textures associated to laser-based additive manufacturing processes pose metrological challenges. Based on the literature review, it is recommended to (a) use mechanically relaxed samples measured in several orientations as appropriate strain-free lattice spacing, instead of powder, (b) consider that an appropriate grain-interaction model to calculate diffraction-elastic constants is both material- and texture-dependent and may differ from the conventionally manufactured variant. Further metrological challenges are critically reviewed and future demands in this research field are discussed.

Highlights

  • In recent years additive manufacturing (AM) has evolved from a technology for rapid prototyping to a mature production process used in several industries from aerospace to medical applications [1]

  • Based on the literature review, it is recommended to (a) use mechanically relaxed samples measured in several orientations as appropriate strain-free lattice spacing, instead of powder, (b) consider that an appropriate graininteraction model to calculate diffraction-elastic constants is both material- and texture-dependent and may differ from the conventionally manufactured variant

  • AM processes allow the fabrication of complex structures, which cannot be produced via conventional manufacturing methods [3,4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent years additive manufacturing (AM) has evolved from a technology for rapid prototyping to a mature production process used in several industries from aerospace to medical applications [1]. AM processes allow the fabrication of complex structures, which cannot be produced via conventional manufacturing methods [3,4]. This freedom of design enables improvements in component performance and weight reduction of parts [4,5]. The rapid solidification rates and tailored heat treatment schedules can improve certain material properties, leading to further performance and efficiency gains [6,7,8,9]. Very often IS locks large residual stress (RS) in the parts after production [14]

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call