Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the difficulty of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Clinical data of patients with BTC who underwent curative-intent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were stratified into two groups according to the presence or absence of adjuvant chemotherapy administration (adjuvant and non-adjuvant groups), and the clinicopathological features were compared between the two groups. The ratios of adjuvant chemotherapy administration were investigated in each surgical procedure. Independent factors associated with no administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed using multivariate analyses. Among 168 eligible patients, 141 (83.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (adjuvant group), while 27 (16.1%) did not (non-adjuvant group). The most common surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy in the adjuvant group, and it was hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (BDR) in the non-adjuvant group, respectively. The rate of no adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients who underwent hepatectomy with BDR than in those who underwent other surgeries (p < 0.001). The most common cause of no adjuvant chemotherapy was bile leak in 12 patients, which occurred after hepatectomy with BDR in ten patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that hepatectomy with BDR and preoperative anemia were independently associated with no adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Hepatectomy with BDR and subsequent refractory bile leak can be the obstacle to adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with BTC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.