Abstract

BackgroundA defining characteristic of eating disorders (EDs) is difficulty with emotion regulation (ER). Previous research indicates that ED subtypes demonstrate differing ER difficulties. Specifically, individuals with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) or Bulimia Nervosa (BN) show greater impairment in their ability to regulate emotions in areas such as achieving goals while upset, reacting impulsively to distress, and effectively using coping strategies, as compared to those with Binge Eating Disorder (BED). However, limited research includes the diagnostic category of Eating Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS). The aim of this study was to better understand ER difficulties for all ED diagnoses, especially EDNOS. It was hypothesized that patients with EDs will demonstrate similar ER difficulties as psychiatric patients without EDs and that patients with EDNOS will be similar in their total level of ER difficulties but will differ in their specific types of difficulties in ER as compared to patients with other EDs.MethodsParticipants included 404 adults presenting to an inpatient psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric diagnoses, including EDs, were determined using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders. Differences in specific and overall difficulties with ER were examined across psychiatric patients using the multidimensional Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.ResultsResults of this study indicate that individuals with EDs have greater ER difficulties in most domains of ER and that those with BED and EDNOS demonstrate the most significant differences in ER as compared to psychiatric patients without EDs. Additionally, it was found that ED subtypes typically did not differ in terms of specific difficulties in ER. One exception emerged indicating that individuals with BED demonstrated significantly greater difficulty on the Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Strategies subscale as compared to those with EDNOS.ConclusionsResearchers were able to clarify difficulties in ER across ED diagnoses. Results highlight the importance of providing ER skills training for patients with EDs, particularly those with BED and EDNOS, and give insight into the specific areas of ER that may be important for these patients to focus on throughout recovery.

Highlights

  • A defining characteristic of eating disorders (EDs) is difficulty with emotion regulation (ER)

  • Hypothesis 1: patients with EDs will demonstrate similar ER difficulties as psychiatric patients without EDs One hundred ninety one patients with an ED diagnosis and 210 patients without an ED diagnosis who were matched via Propensity Score Matching (PSM) were examined for this hypothesis using seven one-way ANOVA tests in order to compare the groups on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) Total score and each of the six DERS subscales

  • The omnibus F-test was significant for the DERS Total, F(1, 399) = 9.44, p = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.023, indicating that there was a significant difference in DERS Total scores between patients with EDs and patients without EDs and that 2.3 % of the variance in DERS Total score was associated with diagnostic category, which represented a small effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A defining characteristic of eating disorders (EDs) is difficulty with emotion regulation (ER). Previous research indicates that ED subtypes demonstrate differing ER difficulties. Limited research includes the diagnostic category of Eating Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS). It was hypothesized that patients with EDs will demonstrate similar ER difficulties as psychiatric patients without EDs and that patients with EDNOS will be similar in their total level of ER difficulties but will differ in their specific types of difficulties in ER as compared to patients with other EDs. Eating disorders (EDs) are mental illnesses that affect individuals psychologically, emotionally, physically, and interpersonally. Research has shown that varying ED symptom presentations and ED diagnostic classifications may indicate different types of difficulties with emotional regulation (e.g., [4, 7, 20]). Those with BN scored significantly lower than those individuals with AN-BP on Cognitive Reappraisal

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call