Abstract

The artificial distinction between relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) can lead to substantial difficulties in decisions on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) at this stage of multiple sclerosis (MS). There is not a simple transition between the two; patients may demonstrate background progression with superimposed relapses for many years. Progressive disease almost certainly starts some years before clinical acknowledgement; once it is identified, clinicians face a dilemma about the use of highly effective DMT. The influence of highly effective therapy on relapses and medium-term outcomes in early disease is well established; however, disentangling efficacy in terms of relapses and progression at this later stage is more complex.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.