Abstract

The treatment of myopericarditis is different than that of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, since their clinical presentation is frequently similar it may be difficult to distinguish between these entities despite a disparate underlying pathogenesis. Myopericarditis is primarily an inflammatory disease associated with high C-reactive protein (CRP) and relatively low elevated troponin concentrations, while AMI is characterized by the opposite. We hypothesized that evaluation of the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation to the emergency department could improve the differentiation between these two related clinical entities whose therapy is different. Such differentiation should facilitate triage to appropriate and expeditious therapy. We evaluated the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation among patients consecutively included in a large single center registry that included 1898 consecutive patients comprising 1025 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, 518 Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients, and 355 patients diagnosed on discharge as myopericarditis. CRP and troponin were sampled on admission in all patients and their ratio was assessed against discharge diagnosis. ROC analysis of the CRP/troponin ratios evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients. Median admission CRP/troponin ratios were 84, 65, and 436 mg×ml/liter×ng in STEMI, NSTEMI and myopericarditis groups, respectively (p<0.001) demonstrating good differentiating capability. The Receiver-operator-curve of admission CRP/troponin ratio for diagnosis of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients yielded an area-under-the curve of 0.74, 0.73, and 0.765, respectively. CRP/troponin ratio>500 resulted in specificity exceeding 85%, and for a ratio>1000, specificity>92%. The CRP/troponin ratio can serve as an effective tool to differentiate between myopericarditis and AMI. In the appropriate clinical context, the CRP/troponin ratio may preclude further evaluation.

Highlights

  • It is frequently difficult to differentiate on clinical grounds between myopericarditis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as the cause of an acute cardiac event [1] since both conditions present with acute chest pain, electrocardiographic changes and elevated troponin level [2, 3]

  • We evaluated the C-reactive protein (CRP)/troponin ratio on presentation among patients consecutively included in a large single center registry that included 1898 consecutive patients comprising 1025 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, 518 Non-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (NSTEMI) patients, and 355 patients diagnosed on discharge as myopericarditis

  • The CRP/troponin ratio can serve as an effective tool to differentiate between myopericarditis and AMI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is frequently difficult to differentiate on clinical grounds between myopericarditis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as the cause of an acute cardiac event [1] since both conditions present with acute chest pain, electrocardiographic changes and elevated troponin level [2, 3]. In light of the specific diagnostic tests required and disparate therapeutic approach in these conditions, it is imperative to establish the diagnosis early, hopefully in the emergency department, in order to provide expeditiously the appropriate therapy. This may require further imaging or invasive tests. The treatment of myopericarditis is different than that of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Since their clinical presentation is frequently similar it may be difficult to distinguish between these entities despite a disparate underlying pathogenesis. Such differentiation should facilitate triage to appropriate and expeditious therapy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call