Abstract
The establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), as the first pillar of an EU Banking Union, represents a significant step towards greater integration in banking supervision. However, the scope of the SSM is limited to a group of Member States. Member States such as the UK have insisted that they will not be part of the SSM. These non-participating Member States (NoPS) will nevertheless interact closely with SSM members, notably within the European Banking Authority (EBA). In order to organise their interactions, the EU legislature amended EBA’s founding regulation. In particular, it introduced complex voting requirements. The aim of this paper is to reflect on these changes and to consider alternative arrangements for EBA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.