Abstract

When foraging partially depleted patches (i.e., a fraction of hosts are already parasitized), female parasitoids must decide: 1—whether to superparasitize, and 2—whether to stay in their current patch (thus missing the opportunity of finding a better patch elsewhere). To make these decisions, parasitoids may rely on different cues, produced both by the environment and by conspecifics. Animals thriving in different environments may differ in cues they use. In the solitary parasitoid Venturia canescens, thelytokous (asexual) and arrhenotokous (sexual) individuals are found in two contrasting environments. Thelytokous females, from anthropogenic conditions, are known to cope with superparasitism in an adaptive way. On the other hand, little is known about superparasitism by arrhenotokous females. We compared the host exploitation strategies of thelytokous and arrhenotokous females in partially depleted patches. Hosts parasitized by thelytokous females were more frequently avoided than those parasitized by arrhenotokous females, suggesting a stronger chemical marking of the former. Only thelytokous females used information from conspecifics for patch-leaving decisions. The conformity of the differences in the behavior of thelytokous and arrhenotokous females with the environmental conditions they experience in their habitat is discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call