Abstract

Aerospike nozzles represent an interesting solution for Single-Stage-To-Orbit or clustered launchers owing to their self-adapting capability, which can lead to better performance compared to classical nozzles. Furthermore, they can provide thrust vectoring in several ways. A simple solution consists of applying differential throttling when multiple combustion chambers are used. An alternative solution is represented by fluidic thrust vectoring, which requires the injection of a secondary flow from a slot. In this work, the flow field in a linear aerospike nozzle was investigated numerically and both differential throttling and fluidic thrust vectoring were studied. The flow field was predicted by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations. The thrust vectoring performance was evaluated in terms of side force generation and axial force reduction. The effectiveness of fluidic thrust vectoring was investigated by changing the mass flow rate of secondary flow and injection location. The results show that the response of the system can be non-monotone with respect to the mass flow rate of the secondary injection. In contrast, differential throttling provides a linear behaviour but it can only be applied to configurations with multiple combustion chambers. Finally, the effects of different plug truncation levels are discussed.

Highlights

  • Rocket engines that are used in space launchers are usually equipped with a conventional fixed geometry bell-shaped nozzle which provide good performance and are quite reliable

  • The numerical results obtained for the Linear Aerospike Nozzle Truncated at 40% (LP40) and LP75 geometries are reported for both differential throttling and shock vectoring

  • Differential throttling and shock vectoring are investigated as possible solutions for providing thrust vectoring in a linear aerospike nozzle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rocket engines that are used in space launchers are usually equipped with a conventional fixed geometry bell-shaped nozzle which provide good performance and are quite reliable. In all these configurations, a significant performance gain could be obtained by reducing the non-adaptation losses: several advanced nozzle concepts have been investigated for this purpose [1]. In the 1960s, Rocketdyne developed the J-2T-200K and J-2T-250K annular engines which were based on a toroidal combustion chamber and a truncated plug [8]. These engines, which were derived from the J-2 engine used in the Saturn-family launchers, were evaluated with both cold and hot tests

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call