Abstract
The dislocation structure, recrystallization, and elongation of quartz grains in tectonites from three localities along the Moine thrust fault have been analyzed by transmission electron and optical microscopy. The dislocation density, 5×108 cm−2, and the grain size after recrystallization, 15 μ, in the basal quartzite unit at the Stack of Glencoul are independent of distance from the fault, to the maximum sampling distance of ∼100 m. The differential stress level determined from the deformation‐induced microstructures is on the order of 100 MPa. The magnitude of the differential stress at the fault decreases by a factor of 2 from Knockan Crag to Loch Eriboll, a distance of 50 km. At the Stack of Glencoul, grains in the basal quartzite are progressively elongated and recrystallized approaching the fault, corresponding to a progressive increase in strain. At 100 m from the fault, the aspect ratio of relict quartz grains is ∼1:1; at 0.01 m it is 85:1. A quantitative estimate of the strain, based on the aspect ratios of the relict quartz grains, as a function of distance from the fault has been used to calculate strain rate and temperature profiles. For a creep activation energy of 0.19 MJ mol−1 the temperature decreases away from the fault with a gradient of 7.5×10−3 °C cm−1. For a differential stress of 100 MPa, a steady state thrust sheet velocity of 11 cm yr−1 would be required to produce this gradient. At 100 m from the fault, 5% of the quartzite is recrystallized from 1‐mm to 15‐μm grains; at 0.01 m it is 100% recrystallized to 15‐μm grains. This small grain size probably favored grain boundary deformation mechanisms over grain matrix mechanisms and thus helped to concentrate the strain at the fault. Systematic changes in the elongation and recrystallization of quartz grains in Lewisian Gneiss and Moine Schist are obscured by the constraints imposed by other mineral phases. The small size of the grains after recrystallization, highly serrated grain boundaries, and large densities of free dislocations suggest that very little static recovery followed the plastic deformation event.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.