Differential sensitivity of CYP1A to 3,3′,4′,4-tetrachlorobiphenyl and benzo(a)pyrene in two Lepomis species

Abstract

Although Lepomis species are abundant in a wide variety of habitats throughout North America and could serve as potentially valuable biomonitoring tools, few studies have examined the induction of pollutant biomarkers in this genus. We hypothesized that the induction of cytochrome P-450 1A (CYP1A), a sensitive and widely used indicator of response to aquatic contaminants, would serve as an effective biomarker of organic pollutant exposure in Lepomis species. We examined the response of CYP1A and two of the major pollutant-responsive phase II enzymes, glutathione S-transferase (GST), and uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase (UDPGT), in Lepomis exposed to organic pollutants under laboratory and field conditions. Two Lepomis species (longear sunfish, Lepomis megalottis and bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus) were exposed in the laboratory via intraperitoneal injection to corn oil (vehicle), benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) (10 and 50 mg/kg), a polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) or 3,4,3′,4′-tetrachlorobiphenyl (PCB 77) (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg), a dioxin-like planar halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon (HAH), and sacrificed 2 (BaP) or 7 (corn oil, PCB77) days later. Lepomis hepatic CYP1A exhibited differential sensitivity to these two classes of environmental contaminants. CYP1A activity was weakly induced in bluegill exposed to 1.0 mg/kg PCB 77 (3 fold induction over controls) but strongly induced in both bluegill and longear sunfish exposed to 50 mg/kg BaP (37 and 15 fold induction over controls, respectively). In contrast, hepatic GST activity in both species remained unchanged following the treatment with either compound and hepatic UDPGT activity, which was assessed only in BaP-treated longear sunfish, was unaffected by that chemical, indicating these phase II enzymes may not be sensitive pollutant biomarkers in this genus. Further, longear sunfish collected from a PCB contaminated site displayed relatively low levels of CYP1A activity despite PCB body burdens associated with strong induction of CYP1A activity in other fish species. The strong induction of CYP1A by BaP with much weaker CYP1A response to PCB indicates that CYP1A in Lepomis sp. could be an excellent biomarker for PAH pollution, but may not be a reliable indicator of site contamination by halogenated hydrocarbons. We conclude that Lepomis species provide a useful model for examining the regulation and potential consequences of differential pollutant sensitivity, but that CYP1A in these species should be used with caution as an indicator of halogenated contaminants.