Abstract

Eyespot is an economically important stem‐base disease of wheat caused by two fungal species: Oculimacula yallundae and Oculimacula acuformis. This study investigated the efficacy of two sources of resistance, viz. the genes Pch1, introgressed into hexaploid wheat from Aegilops ventricosa, and Pch2, identified in wheat cv. Cappelle Desprez, against O. yallundae and O. acuformis separately. In a series of seedling bioassays Pch1 was found to be highly effective against both species. Although Pch2 was found to confer resistance against both pathogen species, it was significantly less effective against penetration from O. yallundae than O. acuformis. Furthermore, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis was not able to locate any resistance to O. yallundae on chromosome 7A of Cappelle Desprez. This has important implications for the use of Pch2 in commercial cultivars as it is necessary to have genes that confer resistance to both pathogens for effective eyespot control. In addition, a set of 22 T. monococcum accessions was screened for resistance to both O. yallundae and O. acuformis to identify potentially novel resistances and to assess the accessions for evidence of differential resistance to the eyespot species. Significant differences in resistance to the two pathogens were identified in four of these lines, providing evidence for differential resistance in T. monococcum. This study demonstrates that future screening for novel sources of eyespot resistance should investigate both pathogen species.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.