Abstract

In this paper, we study the risk taking implications of managerial pay-for-performance incentives (delta). The extant empirical literature is built on the presumption that each unit of delta has an equal risk inducing effect regardless of its source. Instead, following the predictions of the principal-agent models of executive compensation, we differentiate between performance incentives from stock and option holdings. We show that while option delta is positively associated with firm riskiness, stock delta does not have a significant effect on risk taking. Consequently, the relationship between the total value of pay-for-performance incentives and firm risk strengthens as the relative contribution from option holdings increases. Our findings contribute to the debate on the executive pay reforms, stressing the need to consider the composition of stock-based pay when designing compensation packages to provide appropriate performance and risk incentives to the executives.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.