Differential performance of surrogate indices of fasting insulin resistance in low-birthweight and normal-birth weight cohorts: Observations from Hyperinsulinaemic-Euglycaemic clamp studies in young, Asian Indian males

Abstract

AimTo evaluate the predictive accuracy of surrogate measures of fasting insulin resistance/sensitivity like the Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA –IR), Fasting glucose/insulin ratio (FG-IR), Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and the 20/fasting C peptide x fasting plasma glucose [20/(FCP × FPG)] index in comparison to M value derived from hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (HEC) studies in two birth weight based cohorts of Asian Indian males. MethodsHEC studies were performed in non-diabetic Asian Indian males (n = 117), born of normal birth weight (n = 59, birth weight > 2.5 kgs) and low birth weight (n = 58, birth weight < 2.5 kgs). Anthropometry and biochemical analysis were done. Surrogate indices of fasting insulin resistance were calculated and data were analysed by Pearson's correlation and Random calibration model analysis. ResultsAmongst surrogate indices of fasting insulin resistance/sensitivity, the mean values for HOMA-IR, QUICKI, FG-IR, 20/(FCP × FPG) index and M value were similar between the two groups. Significant positive correlation was observed for FG-IR and QUICKI with M value (the gold standard measure of insulin sensitivity derived from HEC procedure) in the low birth weight cohort in contrast to the normal birth weight cohort, wherein no significant correlation was observed for any of the indices. Random calibration model analysis showed highest predictive accuracy for QUICKI in both the study groups. ConclusionThe QUICKI index showed highest predictive accuracy in the normal birth weight and the low birth weight cohorts of Asian Indian males.