Abstract
The ability to comprehend outcomes of skilled action is important for understanding the world around us. Prior studies have evaluated the perspective an action is performed in, but few have evaluated how handedness of the actor and the observer interact with action perspective. Understanding handedness affords the opportunity to identify the role of mirroring and matched limb action encoding, which may display unique strategies of action understanding. Right and left-handed subjects were presented with images of tools from egocentric or allocentric perspectives performing movements by either a left or right hand. Subjects had to judge the outcome of the task, and accuracy and latency were evaluated. Our hypothesis was that both left and right-handed subjects would predict action best from an egocentric perspective. In allocentric perspectives, identification of action outcomes would occur best in the mirror-matched dominant limb for all subjects. Results showed there was a significant effect on accuracy and latency with respect to perspective for both right and left-handed subjects. The highest accuracies and fastest latencies were found in the egocentric perspective. Handedness of subject also showed an effect on accuracy, where right-handed subjects were significantly more accurate in the task than left-handed subjects. An interaction effect revealed that left-handed subjects were less accurate at judging images from an allocentric viewpoint compared to all other conditions. These findings suggest that action outcomes are best facilitated in an internal perspective, regardless of the hand being used. The decreased accuracy for left-handed subjects on allocentric images could be due to asymmetrical lateralization of encoding action and motoric dominance, which may interfere with translating allocentric limb action outcomes. Further neurophysiological studies will help us understand the specific processes of how left and right-handed subjects may encode actions.
Highlights
Understanding skilled action is a basic aspect of our daily living
Our knowledge of a tool comes from the fact that we learn tool and action associations in our cognitive-motor system and from this knowledge we are able to use it to understand how to accomplish skilled actions ourselves, and how to predict the ultimate goal of actions executed by others
Right and left-handed subjects were recruited in order to judge tool-use action outcomes while hand of instructor, perspective, and tool type used in the images were manipulated
Summary
Skilled action in humans frequently involves the use of tools in order to complete action goals. In order to understand skilled tool-use actions, we must understand at least two elements: how to identify the tool needed for a specific task (contextual knowledge) and understand how the tool is used to complete the action goal (physical knowledge; Mizelle and Wheaton, 2010). Our knowledge of a tool comes from the fact that we learn tool and action associations in our cognitive-motor system and from this knowledge we are able to use it to understand how to accomplish skilled actions ourselves, and how to predict the ultimate goal of actions executed by others. Type of tool or object affects the ability to understand the ultimate action goal. New tools might not be able to simulate a motor plan as would a known tool; our previous work (Mizelle et al, 2011) has shown that after directly training with a novel tool one time, it activates the same neural tool network that known tools activate
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have