Differential impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcomes of children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.

Abstract

Asparaginase is essential for treating T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Despite the ongoing debate on whether T-ALL and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) are the same disease entity or two distinct diseases, patients with T-LBL often receive the same or similar treatment protocols as those with T-ALL. The outcomes of patients with or without L-asparaginase discontinuation were retrospectively analyzed among four national protocols: Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study (JACLS) ALL-02 and ALL-97 for T-ALL and Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group ALB-NHL03 and JACLS NHL-98 for T-LBL. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with the Cox regression model by considering L-asparaginase discontinuation as a time-dependent variable. In total, 199 patients with T-ALL, and 133 patients with T-LBL were included. L-asparaginase discontinuation compromised event-free survival (EFS) of T-ALL patients (ALL-02: HR 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-7.90; ALL-97: HR 3.39, 95%CI 1.19-9.67). Conversely, EFS compromise was not detected among T-LBL patients (ALB-NHL03: HR 1.39, 95%CI 0.41-4.68; NHL-98: HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.11-7.60). The effects of L-asparaginase discontinuation differed between T-ALL and T-LBL. We assume that the differential impact results from (1) the inherent differential response to L-asparaginase between them and/or (2) a less stringent assessment of early treatment response in T-LBL than in T-ALL. Given the poor salvage rate of refractory or relapsed T-ALL and T-LBL, optimization of the frontline therapy is critical, and the current study provides a new suggestion for further treatment modifications. However, larger studies in contemporary intensified treatment protocols are required.