Abstract

Automotive differential gears are usually operating at very low speed and high load conditions and hence are usually designed to be protected against the root bending fatigue failure. Depending on application requirements and lubrication regime surface failures may occasionally be encountered as well. Mainstream existing design procedures published by AGMA is based on analyzing one single gear pair engagement while up to four potential engagements, between two side gears and two differential pinions, exist. There are also differential designs with three or four differential pinions that increase potential number of engagements to respectively six and eight. Usually the hypoid gear loading is divided by number of side gears, two, differential pinion loads are also usually assumed to be equal; this is a good estimate when no misalignments are present. When misalignments are present however, load sharing between the differential pinions become greatly imbalanced. This study tries to come up with a simplified analytical approach to evaluate overload factor between the differential pinions as a result of misalignments realized by differential gears inside a differential case. The total indexing runout quality of gears is also studied through treating it as a source of misalignment. This study will help designers to evaluate the effects of tolerancing limits and differential case machining errors on differential gear bending lives.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.