Abstract
Either command words, BLINK and DON'T BLINK, or informing words, PUFF and NO PUFF, were used as differential conditioned stimuli with a corneal airpuff UCS. For half the Ss the stimuli expressed commands that were compatible with the appropriate CR or gave information which was congruent with the CS-UCS contingency, and for half the Ss the command was incompatible or the information incongruent. Effects of incompatibility and incongruity depended upon the topography of the S's eyelid CR! For Ss giving the gradual C form the CS-UCS reinforcement contingencies overcame effects of incompatible command or incongruent information, but for Ss giving the rapid, complete V form incompatibility or incongruity seriously disrupted the discrimination, suggesting that Vs have more difficulty than Cs in recording verbal information.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
