Abstract
BackgroundRice false smut caused by Ustilaginoidea virens has recently become one of the most devastating rice diseases worldwide. Breeding and deployment of resistant varieties is considered as the most effective strategy to control this disease. However, little is known about the genes and molecular mechanisms underlying rice resistance against U. virens.ResultsTo explore genetic basis of rice resistance to U. virens, differential expression profiles in resistant ‘IR28’ and susceptible ‘LYP9’ cultivars during early stages of U. virens infection were compared using RNA-Seq data. The analyses revealed that 748 genes were up-regulated only in the resistant variety and 438 genes showed opposite expression patterns between the two genotypes. The genes encoding receptor-like kinases and cytoplasmic kinases were highly enriched in this pool of oppositely expressed genes. Many pathogenesis-related (PR) and diterpene phytoalexin biosynthetic genes were specifically induced in the resistant variety. Interestingly, the RY repeat motif was significantly more abundant in the 5’-regulatory regions of these differentially regulated PR genes. Several WRKY transcription factors were also differentially regulated in the two genotypes, which is consistent with our finding that the cis-regulatory W-boxes were abundant in the promoter regions of up-regulated genes in IR28. Furthermore, U. virens genes that are relevant to fungal reproduction and pathogenicity were found to be suppressed in the resistant cultivar.ConclusionOur results indicate that rice resistance to false smut may be attributable to plant perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, activation of resistance signaling pathways, induced production of PR proteins and diterpene phytoalexins, and suppression of pathogenicity genes in U. virens as well.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2193-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Rice false smut caused by Ustilaginoidea virens has recently become one of the most devastating rice diseases worldwide
Disease symptoms of false smut in rice cultivars IR28 and LYP9 To confirm Rice false smut (RFS) resistance or susceptibility of IR28 and LYP9, disease symptoms were observed on the panicles inoculated with different U. virens isolates
In the present study, comparison of expression profiles between the resistant cultivar IR28 and the susceptible LYP9 during early stages of U. virens infection uncovered a clear difference in the regulation of defense responses against U. virens between the two genotypes
Summary
Rice false smut caused by Ustilaginoidea virens has recently become one of the most devastating rice diseases worldwide. Breeding and deployment of resistant varieties is considered as the most effective strategy to control this disease. Rice false smut (RFS) caused by the Clavicipitaceous fungus Ustilaginoidea virens, known as Villosiclava virens, has recently become one of the most devastating grain diseases in the majority of rice-planting regions worldwide [1]. Breeding for rice cultivars with durable resistance to RFS is considered to be one of the most economical, environmentally safe and effective strategies for disease management. It was reported that the rice cultivar IR28 has a relatively high resistance to RFS, which was controlled by two major and multiple minor resistance genes [17]. No QTL for RFS resistance in rice has yet been isolated and resistance mechanisms are largely unknown [17]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.