Abstract
Understanding the evolution of farmers’ livelihood strategies (FLS) is crucial for maintaining the sustainable development of farmers’ livelihoods, especially on the arid Loess Plateau, China. This study constructed a novel analytical framework for analyzing the evolution of FLS and the critical influencing factors. Changwu County, an apple cultivation region, was selected as a case study. The results suggest that four types of livelihood strategies (crop-planting, apple-planting, work-oriented, and part-time comprehensive) have emerged since the 1980s. The evolutionary process of leading FLS varies across geographic location. In the loess tableland region and economic fringe region, this evolution followed a progressive path from the crop-planting type to the apple-planting type to the work-oriented type, while in the loess gully region, loess ridge region, and economic core region, FLS jumped directly from the crop-planting type to the work-oriented type. The geographic location, training opportunities, garden area, cultivated land area, production and living materials, loan opportunities, and education level were found to be the critical factors influencing the differentiation and development of FLS. The analytical framework proposed here is also applicable for studying the evolution of FLS in other counties on the Loess Plateau, considering the representativeness of the selected case.
Highlights
IntroductionA livelihood comprises the capabilities, capital (including both material and social resources), and activities required for a means of living [1,2,3]
A livelihood comprises the capabilities, capital, and activities required for a means of living [1,2,3]
As farmers were limited by the level of productivity development, land immediately became the major means of production for them
Summary
A livelihood comprises the capabilities, capital (including both material and social resources), and activities required for a means of living [1,2,3]. Farmers’ livelihood activities have been changing continuously with developments in social productivity. Existing studies have found that, affected by various disturbances, farmers either actively or passively give up their original livelihood activities and seek new ones, creating new livelihood strategies [9,10,11]. Affected by the development of rural society and the economy, the trend toward part-time and non-agricultural activities in farmers’ livelihood strategies (FLS) in developing countries seems inevitable. It is of great practical value to understand FLS and their evolution
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
