Abstract

The World Health Organization defines quality of life as a person’s perception of his position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which he lives, as well as in relation to his goals, expectations, standards and problems. Today, chronic pelvic pain is considered a condition that can significantly affect the quality of life. At the same time, there are significant prospects for using this method to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. The objective: to evaluate of changes in the quality of life of patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) depending on accompanying pathologies. Materials and methods. The examined cohort included 150 patients with CPPS, who according to the clinical manifestations were divided into groups A and B: group A (n=74) – patients with CPPS and suspicion for endometriosis and group B (n=76) – patients with CPPS and suspicion for combined benign proliferative diseases of reproductive organs. The control group included healthy women (n=50).SF-36 questionnaire which involves the use of eight scales of questions to determine the level of quality of life was used to assess the quality of life.Results. A decrease in quality of life was found in all the scales of the SF-36 questionnaire in patients with CPPS. A statistically significant difference was found in all scales between A and B groups compared to the control group (p<0.001).In addition, a significant difference was found in all scales of the questionnaire between the group with CPPS and combined benign proliferative diseases of the reproductive organs compared to the group with CPPS and endometriosis (p<0.05). At the same time, the most significant changes were found in the scale of physical role functioning and the scale of social role functioning.Conclusions. The decrease in indicators on all scales of the SF-36 questionnaire in patients of the studied cohort confirms that CPPS significantly affects all areas of their quality of life. Significantly lower indicators were observed in the group with CPPS and combined hyperproliferative pathology compared to the group with CPPS and endometriosis (p<0.05).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call