Abstract
This study investigated the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles during tasks involving sensory difference between proprioceptive and visual inputs. Participants were instructed to relax their muscles and to observe a screen during vibratory stimulation. A video screen was placed on the board covering the right hand and forearm. Participants were randomly tested in four conditions: resting, control, static, and dynamic. The resting condition involved showing a black screen, the control condition, a mosaic patterned static videoclip; the static condition, a static videoclip of wrist flexion 0°; and the dynamic condition, a videoclip that corresponded to each participant’s closely-matched illusory wrist flexion angle and speed by vibration. Vibratory stimulation (frequency 80 Hz and duration 4 s) was applied to the distal tendon of the dominant right extensor carpi radialis (ECR) using a tendon vibrator in the control, static, and dynamic conditions. Four seconds after the vibratory stimulation (end of vibration), the primary motor cortex at the midpoint between the centers of gravity of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and ECR muscles was stimulated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The ECR motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes significantly increased in the control condition compared to the resting condition, whereas the FCR MEP amplitudes did not change between the resting and control conditions. In addition, the ECR MEP amplitudes significantly increased in the static condition compared to the dynamic condition. However, the FCR MEP amplitudes significantly increased in the dynamic condition compared to the static condition. These results imply that the difference between visuo-proprioceptive information had an effect on corticospinal excitability for the muscle. In conclusion, we found that proprioceptive and visual information differentially altered the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles.
Highlights
Humans can perceive their limb position in space based on both proprioceptive and visual information (Hagura et al, 2007)
Our results showed that: (a) the extensor carpi radialis muscle (ECR) motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes increased during the control condition rather than the resting condition, but the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) MEP amplitudes did not; and (b) the ECR MEP amplitudes further increased during the static condition rather than the dynamic condition, but the FCR MEP amplitudes further increased during the dynamic condition rather than the static condition
Many previous reports have shown that vibratory proprioceptive stimulation increases the MEP amplitude evoked in the muscle stimulated by vibration (Rosenkranz and Rothwell, 2003; Rosenkranz et al, 2003; Lapole et al, 2015; Souron et al, 2018), and this increase is considered to be due to increased excitability of spinal mechanisms (Eklund and Hagbarth, 1966; Hagbarth et al, 1980; Claus et al, 1988)
Summary
Humans can perceive their limb position in space based on both proprioceptive and visual information (Hagura et al, 2007). Previous studies (Casini et al, 2006; Kito et al, 2006; Hagura et al, 2007; Lapole and Tindel, 2015) have investigated the cortical areas activated during kinesthetic sensations based on proprioceptive information from Ia afferent neurons via muscle spindle input. These previous studies have suggested that the illusory sensation of joint movement based on proprioceptive input and the observation of joint movement based on visual input act by utilizing partially overlapping processing routes including the SMA, PM, and parietal cortex, and these brain areas influence M1 activity during visuo-proprioceptive tasks
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
