Abstract
Relevance. To diagnose pathological teeth location suggested many methods of research. However, the available literature we have not met the information relating to the characteristics of the abnormal protrusion or retrusioni, not showing the diagnostic criteria determine the position of the cutters for their planned in a constructive position is incorrect.
 Aim. To diagnose pathological teeth location suggested many methods of research. However, the available literature there is no information concerning the characteristics of the abnormal protrusion or retrusion, not showing the diagnostic criteria determine the position of the cutters for their planned positions in constructive is incorrect.
 Materials and methods. Survey of 62 people coming of age in the first period, two clinical groups. In 1st group included 24 patients with physiological occlusion, and the 2nd (38 persons) with abnormal occlusion. In each group were identified in patients with protrusion or retrusion incisors. Evaluation of vertical overlap conducted on MRI and plaster models of the jaws between horizontal lines passing through the cutting edge of the incisors of the upper and lower jaws parallel to the occlusal plane.
 Results. People with Group 1 protrusion incisors angle was 149.55 3.92. Tork upper incisors were 24.36 2.39 degrees. When retrusion incisors angle was 151.47 2.94, tork upper incisors was 5.85 1.42. In this case, the vertical overlap is in the sagittal and 2-3 mm is not exceeded. Group 2 patients, as a rule, noted the violation of form dental arches in the anterior segment.
 Conclusion. To diagnose physiological protrusion or retrusion incisors used values overlap in the sagittal and vertical direction, consistent with each other and do not exceed 3 mm.
Highlights
The available literature we have not met the information relating to the characteristics of the abnormal protrusion or retrusioni, not showing the diagnostic criteria determine the position of the cutters for their planned in a constructive position is incorrect
The available literature there is no information concerning the characteristics of the abnormal protrusion or retrusion, not showing the diagnostic criteria determine the position of the cutters for their planned positions in constructive is incorrect
[Domenyuk DA, Davydov BN, Vedeshina EG, Dmitrienko SV
Summary
To diagnose pathological teeth location suggested many methods of research. The available literature we have not met the information relating to the characteristics of the abnormal protrusion or retrusioni, not showing the diagnostic criteria determine the position of the cutters for their planned in a constructive position is incorrect. Aim. To diagnose pathological teeth location suggested many methods of research. The available literature there is no information concerning the characteristics of the abnormal protrusion or retrusion, not showing the diagnostic criteria determine the position of the cutters for their planned positions in constructive is incorrect. In each group were identified in patients with protrusion or retrusion incisors. People with Group 1 protrusion incisors angle was 149.55 ± 3.92°. When retrusion incisors angle was 151.47 ± 2.94°, tork upper incisors was 5.85 ± 1.42° In this case, the vertical overlap is in the sagittal and 2-3 mm is not exceeded. Group 2 patients, as a rule, noted the violation of form dental arches in the anterior segment
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
