Abstract
AbstractBackgroundNeurodegenerative diseases lead to memory disorders and cognitive impairments with major impacts on day‐to‐day function. Early detection of patients is essential for an efficient care approach, and differential diagnosis is essential for determining prognosis and tailoring management. Most research studies compare patients by pairwise comparison methods, but this does not correspond to daily clinical practice, in which clinicians need to distinguish many different possible types of dementia concomitantly. It has been shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can mark with good accuracy the different types of dementia, such as: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Recently, Deep Learning approaches have started being used although differential diagnosis is still almost ignored. The aim of this study was to develop a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) to classify probable AD, FTD, DLB, PD and healthy elderly control (CN) subjects starting from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI).MethodThe cohort used in this study came from six different initiatives: ADNI1, NIFD2, NACC3, PDBP4, PPMI5 and Newcastle University6,7,8,9. We analysed a total of 108 CN, 110 AD, 135 FTD, 150 DLB, 132 PD. Demographic and neuropsychological characterization is shown in Table 1. The DTI scans were pre‐processed using the FMRIB software library (FSL) with eddy current correction, skull‐stripping and diffusion tensor calculation. We post‐processed the Fractional Anisotropy (FA) map using 3D CNN. The proposed CNN structure consisted of an image input layer, convolutional filters, several batch normalization with max‐pooling layers and, finally, the classification layer. A data augmentation approach was adopted that ultimately resulted in a dataset of 26’450 brain scans. A hold‐out validation (70% training set 30% test set) was performed.ResultWe found excellent performance of the 3D CNN in discriminating the different neurodegenerative diseases. Figure 1 shows the confusion matrix with the following values for the area under the ROC curve in each class: 0.92 for CN, 0.90 for AD, 0.97 for DLB, 0.96 for FTD, 0.99 for PD.ConclusionThese results prove that Deep Learning and the 3D CCN method are suitable for clinical practice and provide additional clues that can help clinicians in diagnosis making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.