Abstract

To determine the differential characteristics and prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) detected using Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) criteria and then classified using European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) criteria. We retrospectively reviewed 316 HBV-related APASL ACLF patients treated at Beijing 302 Hospital or Beijing You'An Hospital (both Beijing, China) between February 2015 and February 2016. Clinical characteristics and mortality rates were compared among patients with different EASL-CLIF ACLF severity grades (no ACLF, and ACLF grades 1-3). According to the EASL-CLIF criteria, 138 patients had no ACLF, 123 had ACLF at enrollment, and 55 developed ACLF during hospitalization. Both 28-day and 90-day transplant-free mortality were dramatically lower in patients without EASL-CLIF ACLF (0.7% and 5.1%, respectively) than in patients with EASL-CLIF ACLF (40.7% and 63.2%, respectively; both P <0.001). Liver failure rates were similar in patients with and without EASL-CLIF ACLF, but extrahepatic organ failure was rare in patients without EASL-CLIF ACLF. Baseline serum creatinine, new bacterial infection and new acute kidney injury during hospitalization, maximum rising rates of CLIF-C ACLF score, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score were independent predictors of EASL-CLIF ACLF after enrollment. The EASL-CLIF ACLF classification can accurately prognosticate the short-term mortality of patients with HBV-related APASL ACLF. It can also distinguish distinct clinical characteristics and prognoses in patients with and without EASL-CLIF ACLF.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.