Abstract

The recombinant fusion protein aflibercept (ziv-aflibercept in the United States) binds VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factor (PlGF). The monoclonal antibody bevacizumab binds VEGF-A. Recent studies hypothesized that dual targeting of VEGF/PlGF is more beneficial than targeting either ligand. We compared activity of aflibercept versus bevacizumab in 48 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) colorectal cancer models. Nude mice engrafted subcutaneously with PDX colorectal cancer tumors received biweekly aflibercept, bevacizumab, or vehicle injections. Differential activity between aflibercept and bevacizumab, determined by mouse (m), human (h), VEGF-A, and PlGF levels in untreated tumors, was measured. Aflibercept induced complete tumor stasis in 31 of 48 models and bevacizumab in 2 of 48. Based on statistical analysis, aflibercept was more active than bevacizumab in 39 of 48 models; in 9 of 39 of these models, bevacizumab was considered inactive. In 9 of 48 remaining models, aflibercept and bevacizumab had similar activity. Tumor levels of hVEGF-A (range 776-56,039 pg/mg total protein) were ∼16- to 1,777-fold greater than mVEGF-A (range 8-159 pg/mg total protein). Tumor levels of mPlGF (range 104-1,837 pg/mg total protein) were higher than hPlGF (range 0-543 pg/mg total protein) in 47 of 48 models. Tumor cells were the major source of VEGF; PlGF was primarily produced by tumor stroma. Because tumor levels of hVEGF-A were far greater than mVEGF-A, bevacizumab's inability to bind mVEGF-A is unlikely to explain higher and more consistent aflibercept activity. Neutralizing PlGF and VEGFR-1 activation may be a factor and should be investigated in future studies. In these colorectal cancer PDX models, aflibercept demonstrated greater antitumor activity than bevacizumab.

Highlights

  • The recognition that tumors require vasculature to grow, and that the VEGF pathway is a major mediator of tumor angiogenesis, created an opportunity for the development of new therapies that benefit patients with cancer [1]

  • The VEGF pathway comprises 5 ligands, VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, and placental growth factor (PlGF), some of which may have more than 1 isoform [2, 3]

  • Other studies with the CT26 colorectal cancer syngeneic mouse model showed that blockade of both VEGF receptors (VEGFRs)-1 and VEGFR-2 was required to prevent the vascularization and growth of micrometastases [26]. These results suggest that dual targeting of VEGF/PlGF or VEGFR-1/VEGFR-2 pathways would be beneficial in the clinical setting, as the development of metastases, rather than the growth of the primary tumor, results in a poorer prognosis in many human cancers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recognition that tumors require vasculature to grow, and that the VEGF pathway is a major mediator of tumor angiogenesis, created an opportunity for the development of new therapies that benefit patients with cancer [1]. The VEGF pathway comprises 5 ligands, VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, and placental growth factor (PlGF), some of which may have more than 1 isoform [2, 3]. The receptors for these molecules are VEGF receptors (VEGFRs)-1, -2, and -3 with ligand-specific binding affin-. Physiologic and pathologic roles for PlGF were suggested from preclinical models of cancer, ischemia, inflammation, and wound healing [12]. These studies revealed synergy between PlGF and VEGF

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call